Figure 02 alleged to have gashed a steel door in a malfunction (whistleblower lawsuit)

[PROPERTY DAMAGE]

Nov 21, 2025 · Figure AI · Figure 01 · Germany, Europe

Failure Mode

PROPERTY DAMAGE

Event Date

Nov 21, 2025

Primary Entity

Figure AI

Robotic Platform

Figure 01

Jurisdiction / Location

Germany, Europe

Audit Standard

Physical State Verified

Incident Abstract & Audit Findings

A wrongful-termination complaint filed Nov 21 2025 by former Figure principal safety engineer Robert Gruendel alleges that a Figure 02 (F.02) malfunctioned and carved a roughly quarter-inch-deep gash into a steel appliance door, and that internal impact testing produced forces more than twice a human-skull-fracture threshold, with a person standing nearby. VERIFIED-VS-CLAIMED: the lawsuit's existence and filed allegations are verified by tier-1 outlets (CNBC), but the malfunction itself is an UNPROVEN ALLEGATION in active litigation; Figure denies the claims and says Gruendel was terminated for performance.

System & Fleet Architecture

Operating Manufacturer

Hardware Platform

Figure 01View Spec

Operational Sectors

Physical AI / Robotics

Primary Sources & Evidentiary Filings

  • https://futurism.com/robots-and-machines/whistleblower-fired-warning-robot-crush-skull

    https://futurism.com/robots-and-machines/whistleblower-fired-warning-robot-crush-skull

  • https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/21/figure-ai-sued.html

    https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/21/figure-ai-sued.html

Related Incidents & Failure Precedents

6 records on file

Incident Context & FAQ

What happened in Figure 02 alleged to have gashed a steel door in a malfunction (whistleblower lawsuit)?

A wrongful-termination complaint filed Nov 21 2025 by former Figure principal safety engineer Robert Gruendel alleges that a Figure 02 (F.02) malfunctioned and carved a roughly quarter-inch-deep gash into a steel appliance door, and that internal impact testing produced forces more than twice a human-skull-fracture threshold, with a person standing nearby. VERIFIED-VS-CLAIMED: the lawsuit's existence and filed allegations are verified by tier-1 outlets (CNBC), but the malfunction itself is an UNPROVEN ALLEGATION in active litigation; Figure denies the claims and says Gruendel was terminated for performance. Recorded as a litigation-sourced allegation, not established fact. Cap-flag: incident date not disclosed (the Nov 21 2025 anchor is the lawsuit filing date; safety-testing referenced ~Jul-Sep 2025).

When did this incident occur?

The incident is recorded as occurring on November 21, 2025 on the DEPLOY registry. The date reflects the underlying real-world event, not the registry record's creation date.

What robot was involved in Figure 02 alleged to have gashed a steel door in a malfunction (whistleblower lawsuit)?

Figure 01 by Figure AI is the recorded robot involved in this incident at Germany, Europe.

Has anyone responded to Figure 02 alleged to have gashed a steel door in a malfunction (whistleblower lawsuit)?

No responses to this incident are recorded on the DEPLOY registry. Operators, manufacturers, or affected parties can submit responses to the editorial team; absence is not a guarantee no response was issued.

What is the current status of Figure 02 alleged to have gashed a steel door in a malfunction (whistleblower lawsuit)?

This incident is an active record on the DEPLOY registry; no retraction or correction has been issued.